Showing posts with label lily van der stokker. Show all posts
Showing posts with label lily van der stokker. Show all posts

Wednesday, 18 April 2012

Lily van der Stokker at Kaufmann Repetto



Lily van der Stokker – Living Room
11 April – 10 May 2012
Kaufmann Repetto
Via di Porta Tenaglia 7
20121 Milano
Italy

image © Lily van der Stokker – Extremely Experimental Art by Older People, 2000, acrylic paint on wall and couch, 726 x 1130 cm, installation view, Walker Art Center, Minneapolis, USA

Wednesday, 29 September 2010

Lily van der Stokker – Leo Koenig Inc., NY



Lily van der Stokker
Terrible and Ugly

16 September – 23 October 2010

Leo Koenig Inc.
545 West 23rd Street
New York, NY 10011

image © Lily van der Stokker, Leo Koenig Inc.
Lily van der Stokker – Ugly, 2009
Wallpainting and wood, Air de Paris, Paris

Tuesday, 18 May 2010

John Waters talks to Lily van der Stokker



JOHN WATERS The wall paintings that will make up your show at Tate St Ives are hilarious, touching and boldly girly. And this is a museum by the beach. Are you a beachy kind of girl?

LILY VAN DER STOKKER Huh?

JOHN WATERS Your “sweet” work can sometimes make people angry. So you either delight or infuriate people. That’s great, isn’t it?

LILY VAN DER STOKKER A well-known artist told me once he was jealous of my bad reviews. Sweetness as real subject matter is still very hard to get for many people. It’s tricky because the work looks simple. I would love to make art that’s understandable for everybody… but over the years, I think I’m doing more complicated things.

JOHN WATERS But your work is instantly recognisable now.

LILY VAN DER STOKKER My female visuals have many layers. Some people don’t get that either. I’m quite detached from it, but at the same time I’m emotionally very connected to it.

JOHN WATERS Is there irony in your work?

LILY VAN DER STOKKER No. I love the decorative – the flowers, the curls and the nothingness. I love it because I am a girl, but then I’m also an artist, and I love everything that I learned, such as Minimalism and Conceptualism.

JOHN WATERS But can something be pitiful, aggressive and perfect at the same time? That’s how I feel your work is.

LILY VAN DER STOKKER I adore pitiful little things that make you want to cry and hold somebody. There is a work from 1992 that I sold several times. It has the text: “Poor (old) abstract art.” I love saying “Poor baby!”, or “Poor Vincent van Gogh”. One of my favourite lines is: “Women are very good at crying. And I think they should be getting paid for it.”

JOHN WATERS Your works are aggressive too, no?

LILY VAN DER STOKKER You as a viewer could get angry because you are afraid of what you see. You could say I’m aggressive in a sense that I like to enlarge female clichés, such as the decorative and bad taste pink. I’m not afraid of that.

JOHN WATERS Well, if you’re a good feminist, that means you’re a troublemaker – which is what contemporary art should be about in the first place, isn’t it?

LILY VAN DER STOKKER Yes, because as an artist you are not all goody-goody, looking for truth. I do think people have to be a little honest, but lie a bit at the same time, because nothing is clear.

JOHN WATERS One of my favourite works of yours is called Darling, done with marker pen on paper. It makes me think of the Julie Christie movie with the same title, or wallpaper gone crazy. In this piece and others, I’ve noticed you use little marks that in cartoons usually mean “stink”, or sometimes highlight a character’s bright new thought. So, “thinking” or “stinking” seems important to you, which makes me wonder… are you a minimalist intellectual?

LILY VAN DER STOKKER A minimalist intellectual? No, I am a feminist Conceptual Pop artist! And a bit stupid as well.

JOHN WATERS Well, I don’t mean that in a bad way. But you use humour, correct?

LILY VAN DER STOKKER Sure, yeah, laughing about my own feminism and about machismo is helpful. I don’t want to impress with highly intellectual or highly technical stuff, because I think the simplicity of the subject matter has to be strong and unexpected.

JOHN WATERS But you’re not anti-craft?

LILY VAN DER STOKKER No, I’m quite precise how I make a work.

JOHN WATERS Your colours are so bright and sweet – cotton candy colours – that it’s like feeling nauseous after going on an amusement park ride. Are you the sweet tooth of the art world?

LILY VAN DER STOKKER I am trying to be a friendly person and my art has to be about that. I liked the colours to be bright and cheap looking so that I could combine my Conceptualism with pleasure. I’m not as bright in colour as I used to be, but there’s a lot you can express by it. The big themes that have always intrigued me are optimism and childishness, and why the use of bright fun colours has such a negative message.

JOHN WATERS I don’t know if it’s negative. I think it’s more confrontational. Do you think you flirt in your art?

LILY VAN DER STOKKER Rob Pruitt [the American artist] once said that I am this little white cartoon figure that annoys everybody by his speech bubble remarks… Yeah, I guess you could say that I’m playing – playing games with meaning. And at the same time, I adore embellishment, swirls and curlicues. Lots of it! It’s never enough.

JOHN WATERS Are you saying that you can’t gag from cheerfulness?

LILY VAN DER STOKKER I drool from cheerfulness… sorry!

JOHN WATERS Do you have any of your art hanging in your house?

LILY VAN DER STOKKER No. It’s everywhere, but it’s not on my walls. I like making and exhibiting it, but I’m not living in it.

JOHN WATERS I want to ask you about the words you use in your wall paintings. You talk about the weather a lot, which I think is very funny. Gore Vidal once said something, and I am paraphrasing here: “No one talks about the weather to me because they think I’m too smart to waste time discussing it.” Is talking about the weather filling a meaningless void?

LILY VAN DER STOKKER I like things that have as little meaning as possible. It’s about pleasure and does not want to change the world. It’s even a little bit old-fashioned.

JOHN WATERS You say old-fashioned, but, to me, it is not vintage. It seems new.

LILY VAN DER STOKKER I try to think of my work as not new or old, not negative or good, but turning around the concept of modernism or progression and going backwards. I got the idea for the No big deal pieces when I started to read Gilles Deleuze’s Difference and Repetition. On the first page he talks about his philosophy, and then he says, well, you can say a lot about it, but you could also say that we have a very nice sunset today. I closed the book and said to myself: “Great. I will make a whole series about the nice weather.”

JOHN WATERS There’s one piece called Not bad this weather (1998). It looks almost like a castle in a theme park. Do you go to theme parks?

LILY VAN DER STOKKER No, but last year I saw an exhibition of an artist called Anton Pieck. He was the designer of a big theme park in Holland, but as an artist he’s a total no-no. I was interested in him because all the little houses he made were so round and cosy and had snowflakes hanging from them. Like tears. So cute. People love cute. People love tear jerkers. I’m intrigued by how he gets this tear jerker-like imagery.

JOHN WATERS We’re all going to sleep in our pyjamas (2008) looks like a giant box of tissues. Which comes first – the words or the imagery?

LILY VAN DER STOKKER The tissues! When I first showed my work to Hudson (the New York gallerist) in 1989, he said it reminded him of female hygiene products. What a super compliment and great way to think. It opens your mind! In the pyjama drawing the words came first. One early morning I was sitting in the tram and I looked at all the people and I thought: “Half an hour ago they were still in their pyjamas. I like the softness and the intimacy of the pyjamas and sleep.”

JOHN WATERS You make a lot of jokes about being old. You aren’t old, but it seems as if you want to be.

LILY VAN DER STOKKER Hey, I am not making jokes! I feel sorry for us getting older, especially artists becoming old-fashioned and not being modern anymore. It’s a sad thing I could cry about. It would be so nice to be old-fashioned and hip at the same time. I wish we could be extremely experimental until the end, and still be taken seriously.

JOHN WATERS One of your works, Extremely experimental art by older people (1999), is a drawing that also has real furniture in it. Is sculpture a way you want to go?

LILY VAN DER STOKKER My assistant thinks that it comes from my past, because I was brought up in a furniture store, but I don’t think that’s true. On one hand, I like to add furniture because it expresses my concepts of the decorative and the domestic. On the other, I like to add stuff such as boxes and things that I put in front of the wall paintings. People ask me: “What’s in the boxes?” And I say: “Air, nothing. It’s all fluff, it’s to make useless extras.”

JOHN WATERS I love the fashion inspired by your work. I wear that Viktor & Rolf men’s shirt with your ludicrous flower pattern all over it. How did that come about?

LILY VAN DER STOKKER Viktor & Rolf liked my work for years and asked me to design something sweet for men. In the end they came to my studio and took a design for a T-shirt from 1992 – an all-over flower pattern which had in it the word “good” with rays around it.

JOHN WATERS I think you should have a retrospective of all your pieces that use the words “Thank You”. Those are my favourites; just think – “The Thank You Show”.

LILY VAN DER STOKKER I would love a “Thank You” show!

JOHN WATERS Was it hard to get your career started?

LILY VAN DER STOKKER No, it wasn’t. After art school I had no sense of career making, but I started to organise art, my own (very unprofessional) art gallery. I arrived in New York with my backpack on a trip in 1983 and rented a store front. I wanted to organise exhibitions, but I was quite uncommercial and thought I just wanted to make anonymous installations in my store front as if it were a park. I didn’t want to have a name for my gallery – I just wanted to push the door open as if it were an extension from outside. But then I started meeting American artists who all wanted to sell. Pretty soon after, I met my boyfriend Jack and Hudson. The career came quite easily and was always fun.

JOHN WATERS Were you also doing your own work then?

LILY VAN DER STOKKER No, very little, because I didn’t have time for that.

JOHN WATERS The initial critical reaction to your work was a review from Peter Schjeldahl. He said that you directed your attention “towards friendliness, childishness and stupidity”. He meant that as a compliment.

LILY VAN DER STOKKER It was a great review about optimism in art and about the use of the word “good” in my work – one of my best first reviews. I sort of signed my paintings with the word “good” so that people could get in the mood. Quite funny.

JOHN WATERS You use the word “cutesy” a lot about your work. Is that a threat? You embrace the critical terms that most other artists would shun.

LILY VAN DER STOKKER Like me pointing a gun at you and saying: “Hey, I will cutesy you.”

JOHN WATERS All your artwork is about girls and cuteness, yet you always seem to release pictures of yourself where you look grumpy, which really makes me laugh…

LILY VAN DER STOKKER It’s so true!

JOHN WATERS Now, when are you going to make a movie?

LILY VAN DER STOKKER About what?

JOHN WATERS A horror movie of sweetness?

LILY VAN DER STOKKER No horror movie, please!

JOHN WATERS Well, what kind? It could be the ultimate chick flick that would scare all women. A romance, perhaps?

LILY VAN DER STOKKER No… a cry movie… with lots of singing that is a little like whining, like Whine Rock.


© John Waters talks to Lily van der Stokker from:

Tate etc, Issue 19 / Summer 2010

image John Waters in a Victor & Rolf and Lily van der Stokker shirt, Baltimore, February 2010 © John Waters, photo: Susan Allenback

Lily van der Stokker – Tate St. Ives



Lily van der Stokker – No Big Deal Thing

15 May – 26 September 2010

Tate St. Ives
Porthmeor Beach
St. Ives
Cornwall TR26 1TG

image
Lily van der Stokker - All Useless Garbage (detail), 2009, Esther Schipper, Berlin © the artist, photo: Carsten Eisfeld

Thursday, 10 December 2009

Peninsula – 44c







44c
Portfolio published by Peninsula Foundation, Eindhoven, in 1996 on the occasion of ten years Peninsula (1986 – 1996).
The portfolio contains a publication and 38 editions.
The publication has portrait-photographs by Ruud Balk of the artists who had exhibitions in the Peninsula space in those years and texts by Wilma Gerlings. Edited by Tjeu Teeuwen and Peter Foolen. Design and typography by Tjeu Teeuwen. Printed by Van den Eynde in offset-lithography.
40 pages, 21 x 29,7 cm
38 editions by different artists, 21 x 29,7 cm, signed and numbered,
a.o. by Giovanni Dalessi, Henk Olijve, Lily van der Stokker, JCJ Vanderheyden, Dick Cassée, Hans Waanders, Barbara van der Put, Chohreh Feyzdjou and Johan Kuipers.
Book and editions in portfolio of brown cardboard, 22,5 x 30,5 x 4,8 cm.

images cover portfolio, catalogue list, prints Hans Waanders – stamps, Barbara van der Put – silkscreen

edition of 300 numbered copies, of which 100 copies for sale.
3 copies available
price € 400

Wednesday, 9 December 2009

Van Abbemuseum 2009 – 2010









At the moment there are many exhibitions to see at the Van Abbemuseum in Eindhoven. Part of the project Play is the exhibition Repetition: Summer Display 1983. The museum remade a display originally made by Rudi Fuchs in 1983. It's very enjoying and interesting to see how beautiful installed this presentation was. Good to see again in the rooms of the old museum many works of my favourite artists like Ulrich Rückriem, Carl Andre, Hamish Fulton, On Kawara, Lawrence Weiner, Sol LeWitt and Jan Dibbets. After a long time Mount Thor by Hamish Fulton is back on the wall and on the top floor there are 4 other works by him.
This show is to be seen until 28 February 2010.
Further there is a beautiful presentation of works by Marcel Broodthaers and a diplay of an installation by Franz Erhard Walther (1. Werksatz).
Lily van der Stokker is ending her series of exhibitions with guests with two wall drawings made by her as a frame around works by Donald Judd and Jan Schoonhoven (see my post of 22 September 2009). Until 28 February 2010.
Until 29 January 2010: JCJ Vanderheyden in the Library of the museum.

photographs by PF, 8 December 2009 (not very good quality, taken with cell phone):
A.R. Penck, Ulrich Rückriem, Daniel Buren, Lawrence Weiner, Donald Judd, Hamish Fulton, Jan Dibbets, Sol LeWitt, On Kawara and Lily van der Stokker

Wednesday, 23 September 2009

Lily van der Stokker – 2 drawings





2 drawings by Lily van der Stokker (studies for wall drawings and prints), 1992
29,7 x 21 cm, magic marker and pencil on paper

Lily van der Stokker – letter 1992




Lettter from Lily van der Stokker, 11 February 1992, concerning the publication of a print portfolio and her exhibition at Peninsula, Eindhoven (13 September – 10 October 1992)

Tuesday, 22 September 2009

Lily van der Stokker – Van Abbemuseum




Since 2005 the Van Abbemuseum is showing much attention to the work of Lily van der Stokker. In the space of the tower of the museum was her exhibition The Complaints Club (walldrawings) from 1 October 2005 till 25 October 2007. From 2006 there is a room in the museum decorated with wallpaper designed by Lily van der Stokker. She was asked to invite artists to make installations in this room, guests were from 2006 till May 2009: Andrea Zittel, Esther Tielemans, HW Werther and Rachel Harrison. The Plug In # 52 – Lily van der Stokker and guest: Jim Iserman opened on 16 May 2009 and is currently running.

The following text is an interview with Lily van der Stokker conducted by curator Christiane Berndes on 17 August 2006

CB: In 2005, the Van Abbemuseum acquired several video artworks by VALIE EXPORT, Joan Jonas, Martha Rosler, and Carolee Schneemann. They are all artists who, in the late sixties and early seventies, used video and film to create works from a typically female perspective or in which women’s social status is a central theme. While I was trying to figure out how to present them, I remembered our conversations on feminism. I also remembered that you were interested in art and decoration. You once told me about an exhibition in Cologne for which you made a wall drawing that was used as background for other artists’ works.

LvdS: That was the Punishment & Decoration exhibition at the Höhenthal und Bergen Gallery in Cologne in 1994. The exhibition was curated by Michael Corris and Robert Nickas. I had long conversations with them about the decorative element, which I very deliberately use in my wall drawings. In their exhibitions they played with the concepts of 'figure' and 'ground'(1). They used my wall drawings as the backdrop for works by Mike Scott, Imi Knoebel and Peter Halley. This whole idea was later taken up by people such as Erik Troncy, who used it in his exhibition Dramatically Different in Le Magasin in 1997. There they used a work of mine that consists of a plaid pattern as the background for a work by Allan McCollum.

CB: Despite the fact that your wall drawings were very prominent in the room, they were at the same time very open and welcoming towards the other works. That was why we asked you to make a design for wallpaper that we could use for the gallery where we are going to exhibit the work of EXPORT, Jonas, Rosler and Schneemann. You immediately replied enthusiastically, the outcome being plaid wallpaper that we have now acquired for the collection. To me, the wallpaper puts into question the white modernistic exhibition halls. It questions the relationship between the works of art themselves and the context in which they are exhibited. How did you perceive this commission? What was your biggest challenge?

LvdS: In my work I play with hierarchies like the relationship between art and the decorative element. Decoration is often considered inferior. But in this sense it is also supportive. Decoration needs to frame something, encircle it, but it also wants to help and show affection for it. This is an interesting function that I use a lot in my work. For me, decoration is an expression of the need to offer warmth and security. The use of my wall drawings as a background made them look like wallpaper and ended up highlighting the decorative element even more. All this sounds like a strategy I came up with, but it wasn’t to begin with. It was really just listening to my own intuition. I just couldn’t help it. My education as a visual artist gave me a love for monochrome paintings. Almost all my friends in New York are, by the way, also monochrome painters! The fact that I like to work with decoration has to do with a deeply felt yearning, something that keeps coming back and that I would like to explore further. Furthermore, decorativity has negative connotations in the art world. I want to change those negative connotations into positive ones. I want to get to work on it and immerse myself in it. I actually like the so-called meaninglessness of it. In it I see a huge reservoir of energy. In working with the female element, I don’t want to be against something, but for something. The decorative element also has to do with ‘nesting’ and with the female gender. In the early nineties I read the book This Sex Which Is Not One, by philosopher and psychoanalyst Luce Irigaray. She writes very poetically about the feminine. Not that I understood everything exactly, but her texts inspired me. Decoration is not only about wealth and abundance but also about fertility, nature and the reproductive organs. I want to take my kitschy longing for frivolous coverings to the extreme, I want to admit excess. That is why the Van Abbemuseum’s request to design wallpaper is so good for me. I’ve been wanting to do this for a long time.

CB: Your wallpaper engages in a special relationship with the works of other artists in that gallery. We also asked you to develop an exhibition programme for this room. How are you going to go about it? Are there guidelines or rules you will follow?

LvdS: Art is exhibited according to certain rules. But why can’t you hang artworks one on top of the other or immediately next to each other like Ineke Werther did in the 1987 exhibition The Selection in the former Kruithuis Museum in Den Bosch? Why must a painting have lots of space around it? I have my doubts about the self-evidence of this and have tried to break through it in my work. Then we also have, for example, the work of American artist Jim Iserman. He both paints and makes furniture and he upholsters the furniture with beautiful soft fabrics in the same geometric pattern as the painting, so when you sit in front of the painting you are looking at a geometrical painting, while your behind is sitting on the same geometrical pattern. What I also find very interesting is to work with the concept of the ornament. Imagine a nude painting. It has become a cliché and something people hang above their couch. I could hang nude paintings over my wallpaper. You would have to ask yourself which of the two is more ‘decorative’.

CB: The first guest that you invited was Andrea Zittel.
Would you care to elaborate?

LvdS: Originally, the idea was to invite a female artist whose work is related to that of Lee Lozano, which can be found in the former old building of the museum. For me, that person was Andrea Zittel. I first saw her work in the early nineties at the Andrea Rosen Gallery in New York. She had an exhibition of clothing, but also floor coverings. One of the carpets consisted of rectangular shapes, partially on the floor and partially on the wall, with specially marked areas telling you where to sit and where to lie down. The shapes had an obvious relationship with the body and its movement through space. I met her in 1994, while we were installing our works in a group exhibition. She arrived with two small black suitcases,one for the daytime and one for at night. She wore black clothes; a skirt lined with fur that doubled as a coat or blanket. It was a kind of survival get-up. I found it fascinating; the needy body as an element determining the form. I would actually have liked to show a film of a floating island she designed and on which she lived for a month – another one of her survival projects – but she preferred to show the videos Sufficient Self (2004) and Small Liberties (2006). They are about her projects in the Californian Joshua Tree desert, where she lives and works as a pioneer in a settlement of her own design.

Note 1: Punishment and decoration: art in an age of militant superficiality, Artforum, April 1993, p.p. 78-83

interview from the website of the Van Abbemuseum, it took place on the occasion of the presentation: Lily van der Stokker – In the Embellishment, Videos from the 1960s and 1970s by VALIE EXPORT, Joan Jonas, Martha Rosler and Carolee Schneemann (Van Abbemuseum, 2006)

Lily van der Stokker is represented by Gering & López Gallery, New York and Galerie van Gelder, Amsterdam, for more info about the artist:

Lily van der Stokker – Prints







Lily van der Stokker – Prints
portfolio with 5 prints published by Peninsula in 1992 on the occasion of the exhibition of Lily van der Stokker in Peninsula, Eindhoven, 13 September – 10 October 1992
printed in silkscreen by 7 Zeven, Tilburg
36 x 46 cm
edition of 25 copies, each print signed and numbered

sold